Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of phacoemulsification (phaco) virtual reality simulator training on the surgical competence and skills of ophthalmology residents in Türkiye. Material and Methods: An online survey consisting of 21 questions was conducted among ophthalmology residents at university and training hospitals with prior experience using the EyeSI phaco-virtual reality simulator. Participants were classified into 2 groups based on their ophthalmology experience: Group 1 (≤2 years) and Group 2 (>2 years). The survey assessed surgical experience, technical adequacy of the simulator, its contribution to training, and its impact on surgical confidence. A total of 34 valid responses were analyzed. Results: Nineteen participants (55.9%) were in Group 1, while 15 (44.1%) were in Group 2. Before training, 50% of Group 1 participants reported low surgical selfconfidence, which improved to 73.5% at a moderate level post-training. No significant difference was observed between groups regarding selfconfidence gain (p=0.255, p=0.637). The simulator improved hand-eye coordination (76.5%) and phaco technique proficiency (73.5%) but was less effective in complication management (20.6%). The simulation's similarity to real surgery was rated as low by 35.3% and very high by 5.9%. Limited access, financial constraints, and technical issues were the main barriers to widespread use. Conclusion: Virtual reality simulators play a valuable role in ophthalmic surgical training by improving skills and self-confidence. Integrating simulator training into ophthalmology curricula may enhance training efficiency and reduce complications.
Keywords: Cataract; surgery; phacoemulsification; education; simulator
Amaç: Bu çalışma, sanal gerçeklik tabanlı fakoemülsifikasyon (FAKO) simülatör eğitiminin Türkiye'deki göz hastalıkları asistanlarının cerrahi yeterlilik ve becerilerine olan etkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: EyeSI fako-sanal gerçeklik simülatörünü daha önce kullanmış olan üniversite ve eğitim araştırma hastanelerinde görev yapan göz hastalıkları asistanlarına 21 sorudan oluşan çevrim içi bir anket uygulanmıştır. Katılımcılar oftalmoloji deneyim sürelerine göre 2 gruba ayrılmıştır: Grup 1 (≤2 yıl), Grup 2 (>2 yıl). Ankette cerrahi deneyim, simülatörün teknik yeterliliği, eğitime katkısı ve cerrahi özgüvene etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Toplam 34 geçerli yanıt analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Katılımcıların 19'u (%55,9) Grup 1'de, 15'i (%44,1) Grup 2'de yer almıştır. Eğitim öncesinde Grup 1 katılımcılarının %50'si düşük cerrahi özgüven bildirmiş, bu oran eğitim sonrası %73,5 ile orta düzeye yükselmiştir. Gruplar arasında özgüven artışı açısından anlamlı fark gözlenmemiştir (p=0,255, p=0,637). Simülatör, el-göz koordinasyonu (%76,5) ve FAKO tekniği yeterliliği (%73,5) üzerinde olumlu etkili olmuş; ancak komplikasyon yönetiminde daha az etkili bulunmuştur (%20,6). Simülasyonun gerçek cerrahiye benzerliği %35,3 oranında düşük, %5,9 oranında ise çok yüksek olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Yaygın kullanımın önündeki başlıca engeller sınırlı erişim, finansal kısıtlamalar ve teknik sorunlardır. Sonuç: Sanal gerçeklik simülatörleri, cerrahi beceri ve özgüven gelişimini destekleyerek göz hastalıkları asistan eğitiminde değerli bir rol oynamaktadır. Simülatör eğitiminin oftalmoloji eğitim programlarına entegrasyonu, eğitim etkinliğini artırabilir ve komplikasyon oranlarını azaltabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Katarakt; cerrahi; fakoemulsifikasyon; eğitim; simülatör
- World Health Organization [Internet]. World report on vision © 2025 WHO [Cited: February 15, 2025]. Available from: [Link]
- Gower EW, Lindsley K, Tulenko SE, Nanji AA, Leyngold I, McDonnell PJ. Perioperative antibiotics for prevention of acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2(2):CD006364. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Muttuvelu DV, Andersen CU. Cataract surgery education in member countries of the European Board of Ophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016;51(3):207-11. [PubMed]
- Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of the "see one, do one, teach one" concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):1194-201. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Khalifa YM, Bogorad D, Gibson V, Peifer J, Nussbaum J. Virtual reality in ophthalmology training. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006;51(3):259-73. [PubMed]
- Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Cherwek DH, Srivastava SK. The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(9):1215-9. [PubMed]
- Wallace BS, Sabates NR. Simulation in ophthalmology. Mo Med. 2013;110(2):152-3. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Gillan SN, Saleh GM. Ophthalmic surgical simulation: a new era. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(12):1623-4. [PubMed]
- Grodin MH, Johnson TM, Acree JL, Glaser BM. Ophthalmic surgical training: a curriculum to enhance surgical simulation. Retina. 2008;28(10):1509-14. [PubMed]
- Haag-Streit Simulation [Internet]. EyeSI Surgical Simulator: Training Simulator for Intraocular Surgery. © 2025 haag-streit.com [Cited: April 26, 2025]. Available from: [Link]
- Munro MG. Surgical simulation: where have we come from? Where are we now? Where are we going? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(3):272-83. [PubMed]
- Glaser BM. Surgical simulation: why now? Retina. 2009;29(3):289-91. [PubMed]
- Almaliotis D, Athanasopoulos GP, Almpanidou S, Papadopoulou EP, Karampatakis V. The contribution of wet labs in the education of ophthalmologists. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;72:103034. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lopez-Beauchamp C, Singh GA, Shin SY, Magone MT. Surgical simulator training reduces operative times in resident surgeons learning phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2019;17:100576. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sikder S, Tuwairqi K, Al-Kahtani E, Myers WG, Banerjee P. Surgical simulators in cataract surgery training. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(2):154-8. [PubMed]
- Cissé C, Angioi K, Luc A, Berrod JP, Conart JB. EYESI surgical simulator: validity evidence of the vitreoretinal modules. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(2):e277-e282. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Belyea DA, Brown SE, Rajjoub LZ. Influence of surgery simulator training on ophthalmology resident phacoemulsification performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(10):1756-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Baxter JM, Lee R, Sharp JA, Foss AJ; Intensive Cataract Training Study Group. Intensive cataract training: a novel approach. Eye (Lond). 2013;27(6):742-6. [PubMed] [PMC]
- McCannel CA, Reed DC, Goldman DR. Ophthalmic surgery simulator training improves resident performance of capsulorhexis in the operating room. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2456-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jaud C, Salleron J, Cisse C, Angioi-Duprez K, Berrod JP, Conart JB. EyeSi Surgical Simulator: validation of a proficiency-based test for assessment of vitreoretinal surgical skills. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(4):390-6. [PubMed]
- Vergmann AS, Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J. Virtual vitreoretinal surgery: validation of a training programme. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(1):60-5. [PubMed]
- Lockington D, Saleh GM, Spencer AF, Ferris J. Cost and time resourcing for ophthalmic simulation in the UK: a Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Survey of regional Simulation Leads in 2021. Eye (Lond). 2022;36(10):1973-6. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Mondal S, Kelkar AS, Singh R, Jayadev C, Saravanan VR, Kelkar JA. What do retina fellows-in-training think about the vitreoretinal surgical simulator: a multicenter survey. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(8):3064-8. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Campbell S, Hind J, Lockington D. Engagement with ophthalmic simulation training has increased following COVID-19 disruption-the educational culture change required? Eye (Lond). 2021;35(10):2660-1. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lee R, Raison N, Lau WY, Aydin A, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K, Haldar S. A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology. Eye (Lond). 2020;34(10):1737-59. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Thomsen ASS, Smith P, Subhi Y, Cour M, Tang L, Konge L, et al. High correlation between performance on a virtual-reality simulator and real-life cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):307-11. [Crossref]
- la Cour M, Thomsen ASS, Alberti M, Konge L. Simulators in the training of surgeons: is it worth the investment in money and time? 2018 Jules Gonin lecture of the Retina Research Foundation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(5):877-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Francone A, Huang JM, Ma J, Tsao TC, Rosen J, Hubschman JP. The effect of haptic feedback on efficiency and safety during preretinal membrane peeling simulation. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(4):2. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List