.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Fate of Abstracts Presented at the National Turkish Dermatology Congress: Descriptive Study
Ulusal Türk Dermatoloji Kongresi'nde Sunulan Bildirilerin Kaderi: Tanımlayıcı Araştırma
Turkiye Klinikleri J Dermatol. 2022;32(1):69-77
doi: 10.5336/dermato.2022-88110
Makale Dili: EN
Tam Metin
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the publication rates of the abstracts presented at the National Dermatology Congress and the consistency between the abstracts and the article. Material and Methods: 27th National Dermatology Congress was chosen as a reference. A total of the 339 oral presentations (OPs) and poster presentations (PPs) in the congress booklet were included. PubMed, Google Scholar and TR Index search engines were used to search for the full-text articles of the presentations. The type of presentation, the clinic from which it was sent, the number of authors, and the dermatological disease group, the type of the presentation published as an article, its consistency with the abstract, the journal index, the type of publication, the number of citations, the number of months until publication were evaluated. Results: The mean number of authors in the presentations was 3.64±1.88, the mean time until publication was 28.44±9.84 months. A total of 65 (19.2%) OPs and 274 (80.8%) PPs were presented. Universities were the clinics that presented the highest number of abstracts (p<0.05). A total of 57 (16.2%) abstracts were published as articles. Papulosquamous disorders were the most frequently presented disease group with 71 (20.9%) presentations. OPs were published mean 29.64±6.12 months alter and PPS were published mean 27.84±11.16 months later. The publication and citation rate of OPs were higher than that of PPs (p<0.05). OPs were more likely to be original studies and PPs were more likely to be case reports (p<0.05). Inconsistency was detected in 29 (50.8%) of the presentations that were published as articles. Inconsistency rate of PPs was found to be higher (p<0.05). Conclusion: The National Turkish Dermatology Congress is generally productive, similar quality when compared to national congresses and low quality when compared to international congresses.
Keywords: Dermatology congress; presentation; publication rate; inconsistency
Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the publication rates of the abstracts presented at the National Dermatology Congress and the consistency between the abstracts and the article. Material and Methods: 27th National Dermatology Congress was chosen as a reference. A total of the 339 oral presentations (OPs) and poster presentations (PPs) in the congress booklet were included. PubMed, Google Scholar and TR Index search engines were used to search for the full-text articles of the presentations. The type of presentation, the clinic from which it was sent, the number of authors, and the dermatological disease group, the type of the presentation published as an article, its consistency with the abstract, the journal index, the type of publication, the number of citations, the number of months until publication were evaluated. Results: The mean number of authors in the presentations was 3.64±1.88, the mean time until publication was 28.44±9.84 months. A total of 65 (19.2%) OPs and 274 (80.8%) PPs were presented. Universities were the clinics that presented the highest number of abstracts (p<0.05). A total of 57 (16.2%) abstracts were published as articles. Papulosquamous disorders were the most frequently presented disease group with 71 (20.9%) presentations. OPs were published mean 29.64±6.12 months alter and PPS were published mean 27.84±11.16 months later. The publication and citation rate of OPs were higher than that of PPs (p<0.05). OPs were more likely to be original studies and PPs were more likely to be case reports (p<0.05). Inconsistency was detected in 29 (50.8%) of the presentations that were published as articles. Inconsistency rate of PPs was found to be higher (p<0.05). Conclusion: The National Turkish Dermatology Congress is generally productive, similar quality when compared to national congresses and low quality when compared to international congresses.
Keywords: Dermatology congress; presentation; publication rate; inconsistency
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi'nde sunulan özetlerin yayımlanma oranlarını ve özetler ile makale arasındaki tutarlılığı değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 27. Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi referans olarak seçilmiştir. Kongre kitapçığında yer alan toplam 339 sözlü bildiri (SB) ve poster bildiri (PB) çalışmaya alındı. Bildirilerden yapılan makalelerin tam metnine ulaşmak için PubMed, Google Scholar ve TR Dizin arama motorları kullanıldı. Bildirilerin türü, gönderildiği klinik, yazar sayısı ve ait olduğu dermatolojik hastalık grubu, makale olarak yayımlanan sunumun türü, özetle uygunluğu, dergi indeksi, yayın türü, atıf sayısı, yayına kadar geçen ay değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Bildirilerdeki ortalama yazar sayısı 3,64±1,88; yayına kadar geçen ortalama süre 28,44±9,84 ay idi. Toplam 65 (%19,2) SB ve 274 (%80,8) PB sunuldu. Üniversiteler en fazla bildiri sunan kliniklerdi (p<0,05). Toplam 57 (%16,2) özet, makale olarak yayımlandı. Papüloskuamöz bozukluklar, 71 (%20,9) bildiri ile en çok sunumu yapılan hastalık grubuydu. SB'ler, 29,64±6,12 ay sonra; PB'ler 27,84±11,16 ay sonra yayımlandı (p>0,05). SB'lerin yayımlanma ve atıf alma oranı, PB'lerden daha yüksekti (p<0,05). SB'lerin orijinal araştırma olma oranı daha yüksek iken; PB'lerin vaka takdimi olma oranı daha yüksekti (p<0,05). Makale olarak yayımlanan bildirilerin 29'unda (%50,8) tutarsızlık tespit edildi. PB'lerin tutarsızlık oranı daha yüksek saptandı (p<0,05). Sonuç: Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi'nin genel olarak verimli, ulusal kongrelere göre benzer kalitede, uluslararası kongrelere göre düşük kalitede olduğu saptandı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Dermatoloji kongresi; bildiri; yayın oranı; tutarsızlık
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi'nde sunulan özetlerin yayımlanma oranlarını ve özetler ile makale arasındaki tutarlılığı değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 27. Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi referans olarak seçilmiştir. Kongre kitapçığında yer alan toplam 339 sözlü bildiri (SB) ve poster bildiri (PB) çalışmaya alındı. Bildirilerden yapılan makalelerin tam metnine ulaşmak için PubMed, Google Scholar ve TR Dizin arama motorları kullanıldı. Bildirilerin türü, gönderildiği klinik, yazar sayısı ve ait olduğu dermatolojik hastalık grubu, makale olarak yayımlanan sunumun türü, özetle uygunluğu, dergi indeksi, yayın türü, atıf sayısı, yayına kadar geçen ay değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Bildirilerdeki ortalama yazar sayısı 3,64±1,88; yayına kadar geçen ortalama süre 28,44±9,84 ay idi. Toplam 65 (%19,2) SB ve 274 (%80,8) PB sunuldu. Üniversiteler en fazla bildiri sunan kliniklerdi (p<0,05). Toplam 57 (%16,2) özet, makale olarak yayımlandı. Papüloskuamöz bozukluklar, 71 (%20,9) bildiri ile en çok sunumu yapılan hastalık grubuydu. SB'ler, 29,64±6,12 ay sonra; PB'ler 27,84±11,16 ay sonra yayımlandı (p>0,05). SB'lerin yayımlanma ve atıf alma oranı, PB'lerden daha yüksekti (p<0,05). SB'lerin orijinal araştırma olma oranı daha yüksek iken; PB'lerin vaka takdimi olma oranı daha yüksekti (p<0,05). Makale olarak yayımlanan bildirilerin 29'unda (%50,8) tutarsızlık tespit edildi. PB'lerin tutarsızlık oranı daha yüksek saptandı (p<0,05). Sonuç: Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi'nin genel olarak verimli, ulusal kongrelere göre benzer kalitede, uluslararası kongrelere göre düşük kalitede olduğu saptandı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Dermatoloji kongresi; bildiri; yayın oranı; tutarsızlık
REFERANSLAR:
- Evman S, Akyıl M, Tezel Ç, Kanbur S, Mısırlıoğlu A, Akyıl F, et al. What fate befalls the congress proceedings? Conversion rates of National Thoracic Surgery Congress proceedings into international publications. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama. 2017;25(2):249-54. [Crossref]
- Ng L, Hersey K, Fleshner N. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):79-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Peng PH, Wasserman JM, Rosenfeld RM. Factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at the AAO-HNS Annual Meeting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(2):197-203. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yoon PD, Chalasani V, Woo HH. Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full-text journal articles. BJU Int. 2012;110(4):485-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the American academy of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(5):1428-35. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yalçınkaya M, Bagatur E. Fate of abstracts presented at a National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congress: publication rates and consistency of abstracts compared with their subsequent full-text publications. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(4):223-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Oliveira LR, Figueiredo AA, Choi M, Ferrarez CE, Bastos AN, Netto JM. The publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2003 urological Brazilian meeting. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(4):345-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kleweno CP, Bryant WK, Jacir AM, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(10):1875-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schnatz PF, Romegialli A, Abrantes J, Marakovits K, Cunningham D, O'Sullivan DM; North American Menopause Society. The North American Menopause Society: from abstract to publication. Menopause. 2008;15(5):996-1001. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Glick N, MacDonald I, Knoll G, Brabant A, Gourishankar S. Factors associated with publication following presentation at a transplantation meeting. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(3):552-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Seçil M, Uçar G, Sentürk C, Karasu S, Dicle O. Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005;11(2):69-73. [PubMed]
- Ersoy B. What is the ultimate fate of presented abstracts? Con-version Rates of Presentations to International Publications from the 31st National Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery. Turk J Plast Surg. 2016;24(1):8-18. [Link]
- Ozturk Meral A, Balci DD. The fate of abstracts presented at the Australasian College of Dermatologists annual meetings from 2008 to 2012: a 5-year analysis. Dermatol Sin. 2017;35(3):115-8. [Crossref]
- Özyurt S, Kaptanoğlu AF. 2004-2008 yılları arasında iki yılda bir yapılan ulusal dermatoloji kongrelerinde sunulan özetlerin yayınlanma oranları [Publication rates of abstracts presented at the biannual Turkish national dermatology meetings between 2004 and 2008]. Dermatoz. 2012;3(1):7-11. [Link]
- Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;272(2):158-62. Erratum in: JAMA 1994;272(18):1410. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dahllöf G, Wondimu B, Maniere MC. Subsequent publication of abstracts presented at the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry meetings. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18(2):91-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Balasubramanian SP, Kumar ID, Wyld L, Reed MW. Publication of surgical abstracts in full text: a retrospective cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(1):57-61. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rodriguez JL, Laskin DM. Subsequent publication of oral and maxillofacial surgery meeting abstracts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(5):1261-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gera A, Pereira PC, Eapen C. Low back pain in adolescent athletes; evaluation and rehabilitation. J Exerc Sci Physiother. 2015;11(2):76. [Crossref]
- Winnik S, Raptis DA, Walker JH, Hasun M, Speer T, Clavien PA, et al. From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(24):3034-45. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Meral UM, Urkan M, Alakuş Ü, Lapsekili E, İflazoğlu N, Ünlü A, et al. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual congress of the Turkish Society of Colorectal Surgery (years 2003-2011). Turk J Surg. 2017;33(2):87-90. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lee DJ, Yuan JC, Prasad S, Barão VA, Shyamsunder N, Sukotjo C. Analysis of abstracts presented at the prosthodontic research section of IADR General Sessions 2004-2005: demographics, publication rates, and factors contributing to publication. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(3):225-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi