Objective: We hypothesize that pulse pressure variation (PPV)- guided goal-directed fluid management reduces intraoperative hypotension, vasopressor requirements, and improves postoperative recovery in major surgery compared to traditional fluid therapy. Primary outcome: Intraoperative hypotension/vasopressor needs. Secondary outcomes: Post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)/hospital stays, postoperative complications. Material and Methods: In this single-centre prospective observational study, 75 patients (ASA I-III) aged 18-65 years were allocated to Group P (PPV) and Group T (Traditional). Inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In Group P, when PPV was >12%, 250 ml/10 min of fluid was given until it reached ≤12%. If PPV was still ≤12% and hypotension was present, a vasopressor agent was given. Demographic data, oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, pH, lactate level, urine output, blood loss, fluid administration, and inotropic use were recorded intraoperatively. Postoperative urine output, complications, and the length of PACU/hospital stays were recorded. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in demographic data, incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and requirement of vasopressor agent (p>0.05). Preoperative and postoperative IVCCI values differed significantly between groups (p=0.016 and p=0.006, respectively). Total volume of fluid intraoperatively was 1425±926.50 ml in Group P and 3260±917.02 ml in Group T (p<0.001). Postoperative pneumonia occurred significantly less frequently in Group P (3.3%) compared to Group T (13.3%) (p<0.001). The length of PACU/hospital stays was shorter in Group P (p=0.003, p=0.038, respectively). Conclusion: Goal-directed fluid management based on PPV reduced intraoperative fluid volume, postoperative pneumonia, and the length of PACU/hospital stays compared to traditional management in major surgery.
Keywords: Goal-directed therapy; inferior vena cava; ultrasonography; pulse pressure; general anesthesia
Amaç: Nabız basınç değişimi (PPV) rehberliğinde hedefe yönelik sıvı yönetiminin, major cerrahilerde geleneksel sıvı tedavisine kıyasla intraoperatif hipotansiyon ve vazopressör gereksinimini azalttığı ve postoperatif iyileşmeyi arttırdığı hipotezini öne sürüyoruz. Birincil Sonuç: intraoperatif hipotansiyon/vazopresör gereksinimi. İkincil sonuçlar: anestezi sonrası bakım ünitesinde (PACU)/hastanede kalış süresi, postoperatif komplikasyonlar. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu tek merkezli prospektif gözlemsel çalışmada, 18-65 yaş arası 75 hasta (ASA I-III) Grup P (PPV) ve Grup T (Geleneksel) olarak ayrıldı. İnferior vena kava kollapsibilite indeksi (IVCCI) preoperatif ve postoperatif olarak ölçüldü. Grup P'de PPV >%12 olduğunda, ≤%12'ye ulaşana kadar 250 ml/10 dk sıvı verildi. Hala PPV ≤%12 ise ve hipotansiyon mevcutsa vazopressör ajan uygulandı. Demografik veriler, parsiyel oksijen satürasyonu, kalp hızı, kan basıncı, pH, laktat düzeyi, idrar çıkışı, kan kaybı, sıvı miktarı ve inotropik kullanımı intraoperatif olarak kaydedildi. Postoperatif idrar çıkışı, komplikasyonlar ve PACU/hastanede kalış süresi kaydedildi. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında demografik veriler, intraoperatif hipotansiyon insidansı ve vazopressör ajan gereksinimi açısından anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Preoperatif ve postoperatif IVCCI değerlerine bakıldığında gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık mevcuttu (sırasıyla p=0.016 ve p=0.006). İntraoperatif toplam sıvı hacmi Grup P'de 1425 ± 926.50 ml iken Grup T'de 3260 ± 917.02 ml idi (p<0.001). Postoperatif pnömoni, Grup P'de (%3,3) Grup T'ye (%13,3) kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha az görüldü (p<0,001). PACU/hastanede kalış süreleri Grup P'de daha kısaydı (sırasıyla p=0.003, p=0.038). Sonuç: Majör cerrahilerde PPV'ye dayalı hedefe yönelik sıvı yönetimi intraoperatif sıvı hacmini, postoperatif pnömoniyi ve PACU/hastane kalış sürelerini geleneksel sıvı yönetimine kıyasla azalttı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Hedefe yönelik tedavi; inferior vena kava; ultrasonografi; nabız basıncı; genel anestezi
- Holte K, Kehlet H. Compensatory fluid administration for preoperative dehydration--does it improve outcome? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46(9):1089-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(2):231-41. [PubMed]
- Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):650. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Temel H, Karslı B. Sıvı tedavisinde güncel uygulamalar: dün ve bugün [Current applications in fluid therapy: yesterday and today]. Akd Med J. 2020;6(3):334-40. [Link]
- Yeager MP, Spence BC. Perioperative fluid management: current consensus and controversies. Semin Dial. 2006;19(6):472-9. [PubMed]
- Lassen K. Intravenous fluid therapy. Br J Surg. 2009;96(2):123-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lobo DN. Fluid overload and surgical outcome: another piece in the jigsaw. Ann Surg. 2009;249(2):186-8. [PubMed]
- Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1333-7. [PubMed]
- Dipti A, Soucy Z, Surana A, Chandra S. Role of inferior vena cava diameter in assessment of volume status: a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):1414-9.e1. [PubMed]
- Navarro LH, Bloomstone JA, Auler JO Jr, Cannesson M, Rocca GD, Gan TJ, et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group. Perioper Med (Lond). 2015;4:3. ; [PubMed] [PMC]
- Pinsky MR. Functional haemodynamic monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(3):288-93. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Roullet S, Quinart A, Revel P, Sztark F. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):466-9. [PubMed]
- Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R33. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2642-7. [PubMed]
- Giglio M, Dalfino L, Puntillo F, Rubino G, Marucci M, Brienza N. Haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in cardiac and vascular surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15(5):878-87. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Zhao J, Wang G. Inferior vena cava collapsibility index is a valuable and non-invasive index for elevated general heart end-diastolic volume index estimation in septic shock patients. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:3843-8. ; [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nagi AI, Shafik AM, Fatah AMA, Selima WZ, Hefny AF. Inferior vena cava collapsibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in sepsis-related acute circulatory failure. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol. 2021;13:75. [Crossref]
- Oh AR, Lee JH. Predictors of fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a narrative review. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023;18(3):233-43. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kan CFK, Skaggs JD. Current commonly used dynamic parameters and monitoring systems for perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy: a review. Yale J Biol Med. 2023;96(1):107-23. ; [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ishihara H, Hashiba E, Okawa H, Saito J, Kasai T, Tsubo T. Neither dynamic, static, nor volumetric variables can accurately predict fluid responsiveness early after abdominothoracic esophagectomy. Perioper Med (Lond). 2013;2(1):3. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Diniz BN, do Carmo AV, Silveira EA, Silva RM. Clinical benefits after the implementation of a protocol of restricted perioperative intravenous crystalloid fluids in major abdominal operations. World J Surg. 2009;33(5):925-30. [PubMed]
- Perel A. Iatrogenic hemodilution: a possible cause for avoidable blood transfusions? Crit Care. 2017;21(1):291. ; [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, Lemos IP, Auler JO Jr, Michard F. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R100. ; [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kannan G, Loganathan S, Kajal K, Hazarika A, Sethi S, Sen IM, et al. The effect of pulse pressure variation compared with central venous pressure on intraoperative fluid management during kidney transplant surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2022;69(1):62-71. English. [PubMed]
- De Cassai A, Bond O, Marini S, Panciera G, Furian L, Neri F, et al. Reposição de volume orientada pela variação da pressão de pulso durante transplante renal: estudo randomizado controlado [Pulse pressure variation guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70(3):194-201. ; [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hasanin A, Zanata T, Osman S, Abdelwahab Y, Samer R, Mahmoud M, et al. Pulse pressure variation-guided fluid therapy during supratentorial brain tumour excision: a randomized controlled trial. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(15):2474-9. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(1):25-32. [PubMed]
- Calvo-Vecino JM, Ripollés-Melchor J, Mythen MG, Casans-Francés R, Balik A, Artacho JP, et al; FEDORA Trial Investigators Group. Effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications in low-moderate risk surgical patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (FEDORA trial). Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(4):734-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rollins KE, Lobo DN. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2016;263(3):465-76. ; [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: İşlem Listesi