Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Beden Eğitimi Öğretmeninden Algılanan Destekleyici ve Kısıtlayıcı Güdüsel İklim Ölçeği'nin [TeacherCreated Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire in Physical Education (EDMCQ-PE)] Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 193 kız (yaş ort.=12,24±1,11) ve 228 erkek (yaş ort.=12,25±1,08), toplam 421 ortaokul öğrencisi (6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar; yaş ort.=12,25±1,09) çalışmaya gönüllü katılmıştır. Otuzdört maddeden oluşan Beden Eğitimi Öğretmeninden Algılanan Destekleyici ve Kısıtlayıcı Güdüsel İklim Ölçeği'nin yapısı beş alt ve iki üst faktörden oluşan iki düzeyli hiyerarşik model, beş faktörlü model ve iki faktörlü model olmak üzere üç farklı model ile test edilmiştir. Veriler, Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) ve Açımlayıcı Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (AYEM) yöntemleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: DFA sonuçlarına göre, test edilen 3 model de yeterli uyum indekslerine ulaşamamıştır. Modelden 3 maddenin çıkarılması ve yapılan modifikasyonlar sonrasında 2 faktörlü model için kabul edilebilir uyum değerleri elde edilmiştir. İki düzeyli hiyerarşik model ve 5 faktörlü model için DFA sonuçları yeterli uyum göstermemiştir. AYEM sonucunda 2 faktörlü modelin ve 5 faktörlü modelin kabul edilebilir ve iyi uyum değerlerine sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. İki faktörlü model için yeterli yakınsak geçerlik ve iyi iç tutarlılık değerlerine ulaşılmıştır. Sonuç: Bu sonuçlar, EDMCQPE'nin 2 faktörlü yapısının, Türk öğrencilerin beden eğitimi derslerinde öğretmenden algılanan güdüsel iklimin destekleyici ve kısıtlayıcı yönlerini değerlendirmek için uygun bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Destekleyici güdüsel iklim; kısıtlayıcı güdüsel iklim; beden eğitimi; hür irade kuramı; başarı hedefi kuramı
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the the Teacher-Created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Questionnaire in Physical Education (EDMCQ-PE). Material and Methods: The study involved 193 girls (mean age=12.24±1.11) and 228 boys (mean age=12.25±1.08), totaling 421 middle school students (grades 6, 7, and 8; mean age=12.25±1.09). The 34-item EDMCQ-PE was tested using 3 different models: a 2-level hierarchical model with 5 sub-factors and 2 higher-order factors, a 5-factor model, and a 2-factor model. Data analysis employed Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). Results: CFA results showed that none of the 3 tested models reached acceptable fit indices. After the removal of 3 items from the model and modifications, acceptable fit values were obtained for the 2-factor model. The 2-level hierarchical model and the 5-factor model did not show adequate fit according to CFA results. ESEM results indicated that both the 2-factor model and the 5-factor model have acceptable and good fit indices. The 2-factor model showed sufficient convergent validity and good internal consistency. Conclusion: These results suggest that the 2-factor structure of the EDMCQ-PE is suitable for assessing the empowering and disempowering aspects of the perceived motivational climate in physical education classes among Turkish students.
Keywords: Empowering motivational climate; disempowering motivational climate; physical education; self-determination theory; achievement goal theory
- Aşçı FH, Erturan İlker GE. Algılanan öğretmen geribildirimi ve güdüsel iklimin beden eğitimi ve spor derslerinde zevk alma ve güdülenme üzerine yordayıcı etkisi [The predictive effect of perceived teacher feedback and motivational climate on enjoyment and motivation in physical education and sport lessons]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;37(2):123-38. [Link]
- Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Barkoukis V, Wang CKJ, Baranowski J. Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;97:376-90. [Crossref]
- Ortega FZ, Sanchez MC, Cuberos RC, Zagalaz JC, Bolados CC, Knox E, et al. Analysis of the psychometric properties of Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire and its relationship to physical activity and gender using structural equation modelling. Sustainability. 2018;10(3):632. [Crossref]
- Papaioannou A. Development of a questionnaire to measure achievement orientations in physical education. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65(1):11-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ommundsen Y, Roberts GC. Goal orientations and perceived purposes of training among elite athletes. Percept Mot Skills. 1996;83(2):463-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Duda JL. The conceptual and empirical foundations of empowering coaching?: setting the stage for the PAPA project. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2013;11(4):311-8. [Crossref]
- Nicholls JG. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review. 1984;91(3):328-46. [Link]
- Deci EL, Ryan RM. The ?what? and ?why? of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000;11(4):227-68. [Link]
- Newton M, Duda JL, Yin Z. Examination of the psychometric properties of the perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire-2 in a sample of female athletes. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(4):275-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kurucan A, İlker GE. Beden eğitiminde psikolojik iyi oluşun temelleri [Contextual antecedents of psychological well-being in physical education]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;45(45):99-115. [Link]
- Daştan EN, Çamlıyer H, Çamlıyer H, Kazak Çetinkalp Z. ?Beden Eğitimi Sınıflarında Öğrenme ve Performans Yönelimi Ölçeği?nin Türk öğrenciler için geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The validity and reliability study of "learning and performance orientations in physical education classes questioannaire-" for Turkish students]. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2007;12(2):3-10. [Link]
- Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Hein V, Pihu M, Soós I, Karsai I. The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2007;8(5):632-53. [Link]
- Müftüler M. Egzersizde Algılanan Özerklik Desteği Ölçeği: Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Exercise Settings: Validity and reliability study for Turkish]. International Journal of Human Sciences. 2016;13(1):2158-69. [Link]
- Soini M, Liukkonen J, Watt A, Yli-Piipari S, Jaakkola T. Factorial validity and internal consistency of the motivational climate in physical education scale. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(1):137-44. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Masadis G, Filippou F, Kouli O, Gargalianos D, Rokka S, Bebetsos E, et al. The ?Motivational Climate in Physical Education Scale? in Greek educational context: Psychometric properties and gender effects. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. 2020;12(4):321-4. [Crossref]
- Appleton PR, Ntoumanis N, Quested E, Viadrich C, Duda JL. Initial validation of the coach-created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ-C). Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;22:53-65. [Link]
- Gözmen Elmas A, Keskin Akın N, Aşçı FH. Antrenör Kaynaklı Destekleyici ve Kısıtlayıcı Güdüsel İklim Ölçeği?nin Türk adolesan sporcuları için geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The validity and reliability of empowering and disempowering motivational climate questionnaire (edmcq-c) for turkish adolescents athletes]. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;16(3):61-80. [Link]
- Karadağ D, Aşçı FH. Antrenör Kaynaklı Destekleyici ve Kısıtlayıcı Güdüsel İklim Ölçeği?nin bireysel sporlarda psikometrik özelliklerinin sınanması [Examination of psychometric properties of Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire in individual sports]. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;25(4):421-40. [Link]
- Kromerova-Dubinskiene SSE, Appleton P. Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Coach-Created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ-C). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3487. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Angelo DL, Duda JL, BalaguerI, Rosado A, Corrêa M, Anunciação L, et al. Psychometric properties of the Coach-Created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ-C) in a Brazilian sample of athletes: An ESEM approach. Sustainability. 2023;15(6):4709. [Crossref]
- Milton D, Appleton PR, Duda JL, Bryant A. Initial validation of the Teacher-Created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2018;37(4):340-51. [Link]
- Song Y, Cheon SH. Validation of korean version of empowering and disempowering motivational climate questionnaire in physical education. Korean Society for the Study of Physical Education. 2018;23(1):149-66. [Crossref]
- Marsh HW, Hau KT, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu&Bentler?s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling. 2004;11(3):320-41. [Link]
- Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner?s Guide To Structural Equation Modelling. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis; 2016.
- Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2009;16(3):397-438. [Crossref]
- Marsh H, Liem G, Martin J, Morin A, Nagengast B. Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2011;29(4):322-46. [Crossref]
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson; 2012. p.92-114.
- George D, Mallery P. IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step By Step. 14th ed. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis; 2016. p.114. [Crossref]
- Morin AJS, Arens A, Marsh H. A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling. 2016;23(1):116-39. [Link]
- Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User?s Guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA; 2017.
- Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online. 2003;8(2):23-74. [Link]
- Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6:1-55. [Crossref]
- Yu CY. Evaluation of model fit ındices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes [Doctoral dissertation]. Los Angeles: University of California; 2002. [Link]
- Hair Jr. JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2010.
.: Process List